Internet Resilience Index
For people to experience the full benefits of access, the Internet itself needs to be able to adapt to challenges. The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) tracks a range of indicators and assigns a weighted score for each country, measured out of 100. It’s a holistic score that measures how well an Internet connection can withstand things like sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, or unexpected outages.
We've made some significant changes to how we calculate the IRI. See our release note [12 November 2025] for details.
-
Infrastructure
-
Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.
45 / 100global average -
Market Readiness
-
The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.
51 / 100global average -
Performance
-
Consumers have seamless and reliable Internet services.
60 / 100global average -
Security
-
Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.
60 / 100global average
Internet Resilience Score
- Africa
-
41 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 27
- Market Readiness 38
- Performance 47
- Security 53
- Americas
-
53 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 40
- Market Readiness 51
- Performance 66
- Security 56
- Asia
-
55 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 45
- Market Readiness 52
- Performance 64
- Security 62
- Europe
-
69 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 72
- Market Readiness 68
- Performance 69
- Security 68
- Oceania
-
51 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 46
- Market Readiness 49
- Performance 44
- Security 66
- Eastern Africa
-
43 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 30
- Market Readiness 39
- Performance 49
- Security 54
- Middle Africa
-
34 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 21
- Market Readiness 35
- Performance 39
- Security 43
- Northern Africa
-
43 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 28
- Market Readiness 41
- Performance 46
- Security 55
- Southern Africa
-
49 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 35
- Market Readiness 48
- Performance 47
- Security 64
- Western Africa
-
39 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 24
- Market Readiness 33
- Performance 49
- Security 52
- Caribbean
-
50 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 33
- Market Readiness 43
- Performance 72
- Security 53
- Central America
-
50 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 33
- Market Readiness 50
- Performance 62
- Security 53
- Northern America
-
73 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 94
- Market Readiness 66
- Performance 65
- Security 66
- South America
-
55 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 42
- Market Readiness 56
- Performance 64
- Security 60
- Central Asia
-
53 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 35
- Market Readiness 50
- Performance 68
- Security 58
- Eastern Asia
-
58 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 48
- Market Readiness 59
- Performance 66
- Security 58
- South-eastern Asia
-
59 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 51
- Market Readiness 53
- Performance 65
- Security 65
- Southern Asia
-
49 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 33
- Market Readiness 47
- Performance 56
- Security 61
- Western Asia
-
57 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 48
- Market Readiness 52
- Performance 65
- Security 61
- Eastern Europe
-
64 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 61
- Market Readiness 66
- Performance 67
- Security 64
- Northern Europe
-
78 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 92
- Market Readiness 74
- Performance 71
- Security 75
- Southern Europe
-
62 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 57
- Market Readiness 60
- Performance 69
- Security 63
- Western Europe
-
77 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 88
- Market Readiness 77
- Performance 68
- Security 76
- Australia and New Zealand
-
74 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 86
- Market Readiness 77
- Performance 64
- Security 69
- Melanesia
-
44 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 34
- Market Readiness 31
- Performance 48
- Security 63
- Micronesia
-
40 / 100average for 2023
- Infrastructure 31
- Market Readiness 37
- Performance 34
- Security 60
- Polynesia
-
39 / 100average for 2024
- Infrastructure 25
- Market Readiness 46
- Performance 18
- Security 69
About the Internet Resilience Index
The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) draws from a range of data sources, to track some of the key building blocks that underpin the Internet. The IRI enables comparison between countries, regions, and sub-regions, with a balanced set of metrics that accounts for the Internet’s complex ecosystem and varied landscape.
Each country is assigned an Internet Resilience Score, calculated out of 100. It reflects four broad pillars, each representing a range of different components that contribute to the overall resilience of the Internet. Scores are weighted, so a drop or a rise in one indicator can mean an improvement in this country, or that others are over- or under-performing in that area.
Learn more about how we choose indicators and data sources, and about our weighting scheme and aggregation method in the IRI methodology.
Our definition of Internet resilience
A resilient Internet connection is one that can maintain an acceptable level of service in the face of faults and challenges to normal operation. These challenges may include sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, unexpected outages, and more.
Origins of the IRI
The Internet Resilience Index developed out of the Measuring Internet Resilience in Africa (MIRA) project. It uses best practices according to the EU-JRC and the OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators and the same methodology as currently existing indices such as the GSMA Mobile Connectivity Index, the Facebook/EIU Inclusive Internet Index and the Web Foundation Web Index.
API Access
You can access the data underpinning the Internet Resilience Index via our API.
