Internet Resilience Index
For people to experience the full benefits of access, the Internet itself needs to be able to adapt to challenges. The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) tracks a range of indicators and assigns a weighted score for each country, measured out of 100. It’s a holistic score that measures how well an Internet connection can withstand things like sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, or unexpected outages.
-
Infrastructure
-
Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.
41 / 100global average -
Market Readiness
-
The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.
40 / 100global average -
Performance
-
Consumers have seamless and reliable Internet services.
44 / 100global average -
Security
-
Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.
56 / 100global average
Internet Resilience Score
- Asia
- 46 / 100
- Infrastructure 39
- Market Readiness 40
- Performance 49
- Security 57
- Western Asia
- 46 / 100
- Infrastructure 39
- Market Readiness 39
- Performance 50
- Security 56
Georgia
49 / 100
The Internet in Georgia is more resilient on average than other countries in Western Asia, and is high for Asia. It ranks 3rd in Western Asia for infrastructure, a category that evaluates the availability of infrastructure for Internet connectivity. It ranks 34th in Asia for security, a category that evaluates the use of technologies and best practices that support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.
View country report for Georgia
- Infrastructure 61
- Market Readiness 42
- Performance 44
- Security 51
Fiber ecosystem 57
Fibre 10km reach 57
The ability of the population to have access to a fiber connection point within 10 kilometers. Source: ITU
Mobile connectivity 79
Spectrum allocation 73
Mobile operators have access to spectrum that allows them to offer sufficient services to customers.
Network coverage 82
Country has mobile network coverage (includes 2G, 3G, and 4G). Source: Composite score provided by GSMA
Enabling infrastructure 48
Internet Exchange Point (IXP) coverage 68
Shows how well large population centers (defined as more than 300,000 people) are served by IXPs. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), Peering DB
Data center coverage 28
Score measured based on data centers per 10 million population. Source: Data Center Map
Market readiness
42
The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.
Market structure 49
Market competition 35
Calculates the level of competition in the market. This uses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Source: APNIC
Affordability 93
Measures the affordability of Internet connectivity for consumers. Source: ITU, A4AI
Upstream provider diversity 25
Uses the GINI Coefficient to measure the level of inequality when it comes to dependency on upstream connections. Source: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)
Traffic localization 34
Peering efficiency 17
RScore that uses the ratio of networks that peer at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), compared with the total number of networks in a country. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), PeeringDB
Domain count 17
Domains registered using ccTLD. Source: DomainTools
E-Government Development Index Score 75
Score on the United Nations E-Government Development Index (EGDI), which measures readiness for providing digital public services. Source: United Nations
Fixed networks 47
Upload speeds 26
Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla
Responsiveness 96
Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla
Download speeds 10
Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla
Consistency 85
This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla
Mobile networks 41
Download speeds 26
Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla
Consistency 39
This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla
Upload speeds 50
Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla
Responsiveness 55
Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla
Enabling technologies 72
HTTPS adoption 95
Web pageloads that use HTTPS. Source: Mozilla
IPv6 adoption 17
Users can access online resources using IPv6, the new generation of the Internet Protocol. Sources: Akamai, Facebook, Google, APNIC
Domain name system (DNS) security 12
DNSSEC validation 25
A score showing how well DNS queries are protected by DNSSEC, across all web traffic. Source: APNIC
DNSSEC adoption 0
Shows whether the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) using the extra layer of security known as DNSSEC. Source: ICANN
Routing hygiene 57
Upstream connections 38
Shows how well a country's networks are connected with upstream providers. Source: CAIDA
MANRS score 76
An overall score that measures routing security in a country's networks. Source: MANRS Observatory
Security threat 78
Secure Internet servers 66
Number of secure Internet servers per 1 million population. Source: World Bank
Global Cybersecurity Index Score 81
Estimates the ability of a country or economy to prevent and manage cyber incidents. Source: ITU
DDoS protection 87
Level of protection across networks, preventing DDoS attacks against another country's networks. Source: Cybergreen
About the Internet Resilience Index
The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) draws from a range of data sources, to track some of the key building blocks that underpin the Internet. The IRI enables comparison between countries, regions, and sub-regions, with a balanced set of metrics that accounts for the Internet’s complex ecosystem and varied landscape.
Each country is assigned an Internet Resilience Score, calculated out of 100. It reflects four broad pillars, each representing a range of different components that contribute to the overall resilience of the Internet. Scores are weighted, so a drop or a rise in one indicator can mean an improvement in this country, or that others are over- or under-performing in that area.
Learn more about how we choose indicators and data sources, and about our weighting scheme and aggregation method in the methodology document [PDF].
Origins of the IRI
The Internet Resilience Index developed out of the Measuring Internet Resilience in Africa (MIRA) project. It uses best practices according to the EU-JRC and the OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators and the same methodology as currently existing indices such as the GSMA Mobile Connectivity Index, the Facebook/EIU Inclusive Internet Index and the Web Foundation Web Index.
API Access
You can access the data underpinning the Internet Resilience Index via our API.