Internet Resilience Index

For people to experience the full benefits of access, the Internet itself needs to be able to adapt to challenges. The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) tracks a range of indicators and assigns a weighted score for each country, measured out of 100. It’s a holistic score that measures how well an Internet connection can withstand things like sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, or unexpected outages.

About the Internet Resilience Index

Global Internet Resilience Score

The overall Internet Resilience Score for all 180 countries and territories combined, based on data from October 2024

54 / 100
global average

We've made some significant changes to how we calculate the IRI. See our release note [12 November 2025] for details.

Infrastructure

Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.

45 / 100
global average

Market Readiness

The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.

51 / 100
global average

Performance

Consumers have seamless and reliable Internet services.

60 / 100
global average

Security

Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

60 / 100
global average

Internet Resilience Score

  • Asia
  • 55 / 100
  • Infrastructure 45
  • Market Readiness 52
  • Performance 64
  • Security 62
  • Western Asia
  • 57 / 100
  • Infrastructure 48
  • Market Readiness 52
  • Performance 65
  • Security 61

Qatar

64 / 100

The Internet in Qatar is more resilient on average than other countries in Western Asia, and is high for Asia. It ranks 2nd in Western Asia for performance, a category that evaluates how well the network provides seamless and reliable Internet services to consumers. It ranks 39th in Asia for security, a category that evaluates the use of technologies and best practices that support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

View country report for Qatar

  • Infrastructure 61
  • Market Readiness 60
  • Performance 82
  • Security 52

Infrastructure Permanent link 61

Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.

Enabling infrastructure 34

Data center coverage 47

Score measured based on data centers per 10 million population. Source: Data Center Map

Internet Exchange Point (IXP) coverage 20

Shows how well large population centers (defined as more than 300,000 people) are served by IXPs. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), Peering DB

Mobile connectivity 88

Network coverage 100

Country has mobile network coverage (includes 2G, 3G, and 4G). Source: Composite score provided by GSMA

Spectrum allocation 60

Mobile operators have access to spectrum that allows them to offer sufficient services to customers.

Market readiness Permanent link 60

The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.

Market structure 57

Affordability 97

Measures the affordability of Internet connectivity for consumers. Source: ITU, A4AI

Upstream provider diversity 40

Uses the GINI Coefficient to measure the level of inequality when it comes to dependency on upstream connections. Source: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)

Market competition 40

Calculates the level of competition in the market. This uses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Source: APNIC

Traffic localization 62

Domain count 12

Domains registered using ccTLD. Source: DomainTools

E-Government Development Index Score 82

Score on the United Nations E-Government Development Index (EGDI), which measures readiness for providing digital public services. Source: United Nations

Peering efficiency 85

RScore that uses the ratio of networks that peer at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), compared with the total number of networks in a country. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), PeeringDB

Performance Permanent link 82

How well the network provides seamless and reliable Internet services to consumers.

Fixed networks 89

Download speeds 90

Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Consistency 83

This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla

Responsiveness 95

Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla

Upload speeds 88

Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Mobile networks 78

Download speeds 97

Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Consistency 59

This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla

Responsiveness 64

Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla

Upload speeds 81

Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Security Permanent link 52

Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

Domain name system (DNS) security 7

DNSSEC adoption 0

Shows whether the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) using the extra layer of security known as DNSSEC. Source: ICANN

DNSSEC validation 14

A score showing how well DNS queries are protected by DNSSEC, across all web traffic. Source: APNIC

Enabling technologies 59

HTTPS adoption 71

Web pageloads that use HTTPS. Source: Mozilla

IPv6 adoption 30

Users can access online resources using IPv6, the new generation of the Internet Protocol. Sources: Akamai, Facebook, Google, APNIC

Routing hygiene 75

MANRS score 70

An overall score that measures routing security in a country's networks. Source: MANRS Observatory

Upstream connections 79

Shows how well a country's networks are connected with upstream providers. Source: CAIDA

Security threat 79

DDoS protection 87

Level of protection across networks, preventing DDoS attacks against another country's networks. Source: Cybergreen

Global Cybersecurity Index Score 100

Estimates the ability of a country or economy to prevent and manage cyber incidents. Source: ITU

Secure Internet servers 43

Number of secure Internet servers per 1 million population. Source: World Bank

About the Internet Resilience Index

The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) draws from a range of data sources, to track some of the key building blocks that underpin the Internet. The IRI enables comparison between countries, regions, and sub-regions, with a balanced set of metrics that accounts for the Internet’s complex ecosystem and varied landscape.

Each country is assigned an Internet Resilience Score, calculated out of 100. It reflects four broad pillars, each representing a range of different components that contribute to the overall resilience of the Internet. Scores are weighted, so a drop or a rise in one indicator can mean an improvement in this country, or that others are over- or under-performing in that area.

Learn more about how we choose indicators and data sources, and about our weighting scheme and aggregation method in the IRI methodology.

Our definition of Internet resilience

A resilient Internet connection is one that can maintain an acceptable level of service in the face of faults and challenges to normal operation. These challenges may include sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, unexpected outages, and more.

Origins of the IRI

The Internet Resilience Index developed out of the Measuring Internet Resilience in Africa (MIRA) project. It uses best practices according to the EU-JRC and the OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators and the same methodology as currently existing indices such as the GSMA Mobile Connectivity Index, the Facebook/EIU Inclusive Internet Index and the Web Foundation Web Index.

API Access

You can access the data underpinning the Internet Resilience Index via our API