Internet Resilience Index

For people to experience the full benefits of access, the Internet itself needs to be able to adapt to challenges. The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) tracks a range of indicators and assigns a weighted score for each country, measured out of 100. It’s a holistic score that measures how well an Internet connection can withstand things like sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, or unexpected outages.

About the Internet Resilience Index

Global Internet Resilience Score

The overall Internet Resilience Score for all 180 countries and territories combined, based on data from October 2024

54 / 100
global average

We've made some significant changes to how we calculate the IRI. See our release note [12 November 2025] for details.

Infrastructure

Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.

45 / 100
global average

Market Readiness

The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.

51 / 100
global average

Performance

Consumers have seamless and reliable Internet services.

60 / 100
global average

Security

Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

60 / 100
global average

Internet Resilience Score

  • Europe
  • 69 / 100
  • Infrastructure 72
  • Market Readiness 68
  • Performance 69
  • Security 68
  • Eastern Europe
  • 64 / 100
  • Infrastructure 61
  • Market Readiness 66
  • Performance 67
  • Security 64

Poland

73 / 100

The Internet in Poland is more resilient on average than other countries in Eastern Europe, and is high for Europe. It ranks 1st in Eastern Europe for market readiness, a category that evaluates the overall competitiveness of the market, and the ability to offer affordable prices to consumers. It ranks 26th in Europe for performance, a category that evaluates how well the network provides seamless and reliable Internet services to consumers.

View country report for Poland

  • Infrastructure 79
  • Market Readiness 79
  • Performance 66
  • Security 68

Infrastructure Permanent link 79

Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.

Enabling infrastructure 73

Data center coverage 46

Score measured based on data centers per 10 million population. Source: Data Center Map

Internet Exchange Point (IXP) coverage 100

Shows how well large population centers (defined as more than 300,000 people) are served by IXPs. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), Peering DB

Mobile connectivity 86

Network coverage 93

Country has mobile network coverage (includes 2G, 3G, and 4G). Source: Composite score provided by GSMA

Spectrum allocation 68

Mobile operators have access to spectrum that allows them to offer sufficient services to customers.

Market readiness Permanent link 79

The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.

Market structure 88

Affordability 93

Measures the affordability of Internet connectivity for consumers. Source: ITU, A4AI

Upstream provider diversity 79

Uses the GINI Coefficient to measure the level of inequality when it comes to dependency on upstream connections. Source: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)

Market competition 92

Calculates the level of competition in the market. This uses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Source: APNIC

Traffic localization 70

Domain count 90

Domains registered using ccTLD. Source: DomainTools

E-Government Development Index Score 87

Score on the United Nations E-Government Development Index (EGDI), which measures readiness for providing digital public services. Source: United Nations

Peering efficiency 44

RScore that uses the ratio of networks that peer at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), compared with the total number of networks in a country. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), PeeringDB

Performance Permanent link 66

How well the network provides seamless and reliable Internet services to consumers.

Fixed networks 79

Download speeds 89

Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Consistency 73

This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla

Responsiveness 82

Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla

Upload speeds 70

Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Mobile networks 58

Download speeds 69

Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Consistency 56

This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla

Responsiveness 59

Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla

Upload speeds 48

Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Security Permanent link 68

Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

Domain name system (DNS) security 73

DNSSEC adoption 100

Shows whether the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) using the extra layer of security known as DNSSEC. Source: ICANN

DNSSEC validation 46

A score showing how well DNS queries are protected by DNSSEC, across all web traffic. Source: APNIC

Enabling technologies 72

HTTPS adoption 93

Web pageloads that use HTTPS. Source: Mozilla

IPv6 adoption 21

Users can access online resources using IPv6, the new generation of the Internet Protocol. Sources: Akamai, Facebook, Google, APNIC

Routing hygiene 66

MANRS score 62

An overall score that measures routing security in a country's networks. Source: MANRS Observatory

Upstream connections 69

Shows how well a country's networks are connected with upstream providers. Source: CAIDA

Security threat 61

DDoS protection 0

Level of protection across networks, preventing DDoS attacks against another country's networks. Source: Cybergreen

Global Cybersecurity Index Score 93

Estimates the ability of a country or economy to prevent and manage cyber incidents. Source: ITU

Secure Internet servers 80

Number of secure Internet servers per 1 million population. Source: World Bank

About the Internet Resilience Index

The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) draws from a range of data sources, to track some of the key building blocks that underpin the Internet. The IRI enables comparison between countries, regions, and sub-regions, with a balanced set of metrics that accounts for the Internet’s complex ecosystem and varied landscape.

Each country is assigned an Internet Resilience Score, calculated out of 100. It reflects four broad pillars, each representing a range of different components that contribute to the overall resilience of the Internet. Scores are weighted, so a drop or a rise in one indicator can mean an improvement in this country, or that others are over- or under-performing in that area.

Learn more about how we choose indicators and data sources, and about our weighting scheme and aggregation method in the IRI methodology.

Our definition of Internet resilience

A resilient Internet connection is one that can maintain an acceptable level of service in the face of faults and challenges to normal operation. These challenges may include sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, unexpected outages, and more.

Origins of the IRI

The Internet Resilience Index developed out of the Measuring Internet Resilience in Africa (MIRA) project. It uses best practices according to the EU-JRC and the OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators and the same methodology as currently existing indices such as the GSMA Mobile Connectivity Index, the Facebook/EIU Inclusive Internet Index and the Web Foundation Web Index.

API Access

You can access the data underpinning the Internet Resilience Index via our API