Internet Resilience Index

For people to experience the full benefits of access, the Internet itself needs to be able to adapt to challenges. The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) tracks a range of indicators and assigns a weighted score for each country, measured out of 100. It’s a holistic score that measures how well an Internet connection can withstand things like sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, or unexpected outages.

About the Internet Resilience Index

Global Internet Resilience Score

The overall Internet Resilience Score for all 180 countries and territories combined, based on data from October 2024

54 / 100
global average

We've made some significant changes to how we calculate the IRI. See our release note [12 November 2025] for details.

Infrastructure

Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.

45 / 100
global average

Market Readiness

The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.

51 / 100
global average

Performance

Consumers have seamless and reliable Internet services.

60 / 100
global average

Security

Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

60 / 100
global average

Internet Resilience Score

  • Africa
  • 41 / 100
  • Infrastructure 27
  • Market Readiness 38
  • Performance 47
  • Security 53
  • Western Africa
  • 39 / 100
  • Infrastructure 24
  • Market Readiness 33
  • Performance 49
  • Security 52

Cabo Verde

45 / 100

The Internet in Cabo Verde is more resilient on average than other countries in Western Africa, and is high for Africa. It ranks 2nd in Western Africa for infrastructure, a category that evaluates the availability of infrastructure for Internet connectivity. It ranks 30th in Africa for security, a category that evaluates the use of technologies and best practices that support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

View country report for Cabo Verde

  • Infrastructure 36
  • Market Readiness 46
  • Performance 50
  • Security 50

Infrastructure Permanent link 36

Physical infrastructure for Internet connectivity exists, and is available.

Enabling infrastructure 32

Data center coverage 43

Score measured based on data centers per 10 million population. Source: Data Center Map

Internet Exchange Point (IXP) coverage 20

Shows how well large population centers (defined as more than 300,000 people) are served by IXPs. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), Peering DB

Mobile connectivity 40

Network coverage 51

Country has mobile network coverage (includes 2G, 3G, and 4G). Source: Composite score provided by GSMA

Spectrum allocation 14

Mobile operators have access to spectrum that allows them to offer sufficient services to customers.

Market readiness Permanent link 46

The ability of the market to offer affordable prices to consumers by maintaining diversity and competition.

Market structure 36

Affordability 71

Measures the affordability of Internet connectivity for consumers. Source: ITU, A4AI

Upstream provider diversity 0

Uses the GINI Coefficient to measure the level of inequality when it comes to dependency on upstream connections. Source: Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ)

Market competition 37

Calculates the level of competition in the market. This uses the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). Source: APNIC

Traffic localization 56

Domain count 13

Domains registered using ccTLD. Source: DomainTools

E-Government Development Index Score 59

Score on the United Nations E-Government Development Index (EGDI), which measures readiness for providing digital public services. Source: United Nations

Peering efficiency 87

RScore that uses the ratio of networks that peer at Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), compared with the total number of networks in a country. Sources: Packet Clearing House (PCH), PeeringDB

Performance Permanent link 50

How well the network provides seamless and reliable Internet services to consumers.

Fixed networks 49

Download speeds 50

Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Consistency 37

This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla

Responsiveness 64

Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla

Upload speeds 45

Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Mobile networks 50

Download speeds 47

Download speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Consistency 45

This measures the network jitter, which shows consistency of speed and performance across networks. Source: Ookla

Responsiveness 64

Measures how quickly content reaches a user. A connection that's responsive is low in latency or lag. Source: Ookla

Upload speeds 47

Upload speeds, measured by Ookla speed tests. Source: Ookla

Security Permanent link 50

Technologies and best practices support a network’s ability to resist disruptions.

Domain name system (DNS) security 38

DNSSEC adoption 0

Shows whether the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) using the extra layer of security known as DNSSEC. Source: ICANN

DNSSEC validation 76

A score showing how well DNS queries are protected by DNSSEC, across all web traffic. Source: APNIC

Enabling technologies 69

HTTPS adoption 98

Web pageloads that use HTTPS. Source: Mozilla

IPv6 adoption 1

Users can access online resources using IPv6, the new generation of the Internet Protocol. Sources: Akamai, Facebook, Google, APNIC

Routing hygiene 38

MANRS score 56

An overall score that measures routing security in a country's networks. Source: MANRS Observatory

Upstream connections 21

Shows how well a country's networks are connected with upstream providers. Source: CAIDA

Security threat 65

DDoS protection 100

Level of protection across networks, preventing DDoS attacks against another country's networks. Source: Cybergreen

Global Cybersecurity Index Score 50

Estimates the ability of a country or economy to prevent and manage cyber incidents. Source: ITU

Secure Internet servers 49

Number of secure Internet servers per 1 million population. Source: World Bank

About the Internet Resilience Index

The Pulse Internet Resilience Index (IRI) draws from a range of data sources, to track some of the key building blocks that underpin the Internet. The IRI enables comparison between countries, regions, and sub-regions, with a balanced set of metrics that accounts for the Internet’s complex ecosystem and varied landscape.

Each country is assigned an Internet Resilience Score, calculated out of 100. It reflects four broad pillars, each representing a range of different components that contribute to the overall resilience of the Internet. Scores are weighted, so a drop or a rise in one indicator can mean an improvement in this country, or that others are over- or under-performing in that area.

Learn more about how we choose indicators and data sources, and about our weighting scheme and aggregation method in the IRI methodology.

Our definition of Internet resilience

A resilient Internet connection is one that can maintain an acceptable level of service in the face of faults and challenges to normal operation. These challenges may include sudden changes in Internet traffic, suspicious activity, unexpected outages, and more.

Origins of the IRI

The Internet Resilience Index developed out of the Measuring Internet Resilience in Africa (MIRA) project. It uses best practices according to the EU-JRC and the OECD Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators and the same methodology as currently existing indices such as the GSMA Mobile Connectivity Index, the Facebook/EIU Inclusive Internet Index and the Web Foundation Web Index.

API Access

You can access the data underpinning the Internet Resilience Index via our API